<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confusions from DA&#8217;s 19/20th Feb Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://datrippers.com/2010/02/19/confusions-from-das-1920th-feb-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://datrippers.com/2010/02/19/confusions-from-das-1920th-feb-edition/</link>
	<description>&#34;A force for good&#34;, David Astle (DA)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:28:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2010/02/19/confusions-from-das-1920th-feb-edition/#comment-3989</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 05:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=698#comment-3989</guid>
		<description>Not sure if I followed all of that canal stuff! But I&#039;ve just looked at the clue again and noticed the little word &quot;in&quot;. So the defintion might not be &quot;ear canal&quot;, but &quot;in ear canal&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if I followed all of that canal stuff! But I&#8217;ve just looked at the clue again and noticed the little word &#8220;in&#8221;. So the defintion might not be &#8220;ear canal&#8221;, but &#8220;in ear canal&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MF</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2010/02/19/confusions-from-das-1920th-feb-edition/#comment-3987</link>
		<dc:creator>MF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=698#comment-3987</guid>
		<description>Yes, JG, but A canal in the ear is not the same as THE ear canal.  The latter is the &quot;tube running from the outer ear to the middle ear&quot;.  In contrast, the ampullae are various thingies within the inner ear.  (Wikipedia is your friend.)

... actually, looking at the strict definition of ampulla, this may be a DA error (cf. emirate/sultanate):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampulla says:
  [...] By extension, in scientific contexts, it may mean a dilated segment in a tubular structure. [...]
which means -- backed up by the page on &quot;Inner ear&quot; -- the ampullae are at the end of canals, but are not canals themselves.  So the definition part of 21D seems bogus.

But I doubt any of us really care anymore ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, JG, but A canal in the ear is not the same as THE ear canal.  The latter is the &#8220;tube running from the outer ear to the middle ear&#8221;.  In contrast, the ampullae are various thingies within the inner ear.  (Wikipedia is your friend.)</p>
<p>&#8230; actually, looking at the strict definition of ampulla, this may be a DA error (cf. emirate/sultanate):<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampulla" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampulla</a> says:<br />
  [...] By extension, in scientific contexts, it may mean a dilated segment in a tubular structure. [...]<br />
which means &#8212; backed up by the page on &#8220;Inner ear&#8221; &#8212; the ampullae are at the end of canals, but are not canals themselves.  So the definition part of 21D seems bogus.</p>
<p>But I doubt any of us really care anymore &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JG</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2010/02/19/confusions-from-das-1920th-feb-edition/#comment-3986</link>
		<dc:creator>JG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 03:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=698#comment-3986</guid>
		<description>MF, my Chambers has &quot;the dilated end of a semicircular canal in the ear&quot;; we need help from an ENT man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MF, my Chambers has &#8220;the dilated end of a semicircular canal in the ear&#8221;; we need help from an ENT man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MF</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2010/02/19/confusions-from-das-1920th-feb-edition/#comment-3985</link>
		<dc:creator>MF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=698#comment-3985</guid>
		<description>&gt; 21D: AMPULLA is part of the ear canal and an anagram of “up llama”.

Almost. An  &quot;ampulla&quot; is a canal in the inner ear i.e. AN ear canal, not part of THE ear canal.

(Thank you, wikipedia ... one of the many answers I had to double check for this DA :-)

Apologies for the pedantry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; 21D: AMPULLA is part of the ear canal and an anagram of “up llama”.</p>
<p>Almost. An  &#8220;ampulla&#8221; is a canal in the inner ear i.e. AN ear canal, not part of THE ear canal.</p>
<p>(Thank you, wikipedia &#8230; one of the many answers I had to double check for this DA :-)</p>
<p>Apologies for the pedantry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JG</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2010/02/19/confusions-from-das-1920th-feb-edition/#comment-3984</link>
		<dc:creator>JG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=698#comment-3984</guid>
		<description>20A: in &#039;04, CB performed as Hedda GABLER, and GABLER = (Clark) Gable, the &quot;actor&quot;, + R =&quot;right&quot;.
21D: AMPULLA  is part of the ear canal and an anagram of &quot;up llama&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20A: in &#8217;04, CB performed as Hedda GABLER, and GABLER = (Clark) Gable, the &#8220;actor&#8221;, + R =&#8221;right&#8221;.<br />
21D: AMPULLA  is part of the ear canal and an anagram of &#8220;up llama&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2010/02/19/confusions-from-das-1920th-feb-edition/#comment-3983</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 22:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=698#comment-3983</guid>
		<description>need answer for 20A and 21D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>need answer for 20A and 21D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TT</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2010/02/19/confusions-from-das-1920th-feb-edition/#comment-3981</link>
		<dc:creator>TT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 05:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=698#comment-3981</guid>
		<description>Request for DA. How about Klaus Kinski, Warren Oates or Ennio Morricone instead of Aussie Cate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Request for DA. How about Klaus Kinski, Warren Oates or Ennio Morricone instead of Aussie Cate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TT</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2010/02/19/confusions-from-das-1920th-feb-edition/#comment-3980</link>
		<dc:creator>TT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 05:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=698#comment-3980</guid>
		<description>6A: Is it really EGGS? Damn! Yet again I fall into a right-but-wrong trap.

Spurs, say, take the stuffing out of gunners (4)

&quot;take the stuffing out of gunners&quot; = GS

&quot;say&quot; = GEES = &quot;spurs&quot;

1D: Had it arse-about with TOGGLED instead of BOGGLED. No wonder I couldn&#039;t find a film called BHE AVIATOR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6A: Is it really EGGS? Damn! Yet again I fall into a right-but-wrong trap.</p>
<p>Spurs, say, take the stuffing out of gunners (4)</p>
<p>&#8220;take the stuffing out of gunners&#8221; = GS</p>
<p>&#8220;say&#8221; = GEES = &#8220;spurs&#8221;</p>
<p>1D: Had it arse-about with TOGGLED instead of BOGGLED. No wonder I couldn&#8217;t find a film called BHE AVIATOR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2010/02/19/confusions-from-das-1920th-feb-edition/#comment-3979</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=698#comment-3979</guid>
		<description>DA has chosen three different ways to refer to Cate Blanchett. Most references are to 15D, a couple are to 29A, and one is to 29A 15D. Why the variation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DA has chosen three different ways to refer to Cate Blanchett. Most references are to 15D, a couple are to 29A, and one is to 29A 15D. Why the variation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2010/02/19/confusions-from-das-1920th-feb-edition/#comment-3978</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=698#comment-3978</guid>
		<description>6A is pretty good too.
Spurs = EGGS
say = EG
take the stuffing out of Gunners = GS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6A is pretty good too.<br />
Spurs = EGGS<br />
say = EG<br />
take the stuffing out of Gunners = GS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

