<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DA&#8217;s Last in Jan 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://datrippers.com/2010/01/29/das-last-in-jan-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://datrippers.com/2010/01/29/das-last-in-jan-2010/</link>
	<description>&#34;A force for good&#34;, David Astle (DA)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:46:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2010/01/29/das-last-in-jan-2010/#comment-3720</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=641#comment-3720</guid>
		<description>Phew! This was a struggle, but I managed to get it out. Quite a few queries, some of which have been answered by consulting dictionary/google just now. I liked 12A, and 14D for its brevity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phew! This was a struggle, but I managed to get it out. Quite a few queries, some of which have been answered by consulting dictionary/google just now. I liked 12A, and 14D for its brevity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AG</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2010/01/29/das-last-in-jan-2010/#comment-3712</link>
		<dc:creator>AG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 06:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=641#comment-3712</guid>
		<description>A couple of complaints about this one, listed in the spoilers-allowed thread. Nothing brilliant - I liked the ones AL liked, and 14D was excellent in its elegant brevity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of complaints about this one, listed in the spoilers-allowed thread. Nothing brilliant &#8211; I liked the ones AL liked, and 14D was excellent in its elegant brevity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AL</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2010/01/29/das-last-in-jan-2010/#comment-3699</link>
		<dc:creator>AL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=641#comment-3699</guid>
		<description>O.K. another week another D.A. Is it my imagination or have recent puzzles featured some clues that can only be described as clunky (not easy to solve but excessively convoluted and cumbersome?)........maybe a new category ....for which I nominate in this week&#039;s: 1D
Still lots to like especially 26A (sneaky) 15D,22A and 29A. 21D was my pick, short and quite sweet.3D was amusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O.K. another week another D.A. Is it my imagination or have recent puzzles featured some clues that can only be described as clunky (not easy to solve but excessively convoluted and cumbersome?)&#8230;&#8230;..maybe a new category &#8230;.for which I nominate in this week&#8217;s: 1D<br />
Still lots to like especially 26A (sneaky) 15D,22A and 29A. 21D was my pick, short and quite sweet.3D was amusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

