<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s DA On About? (from the 27/28th of November)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://datrippers.com/2009/11/27/whats-da-on-about-from-the-2728th-of-november/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://datrippers.com/2009/11/27/whats-da-on-about-from-the-2728th-of-november/</link>
	<description>&#34;A force for good&#34;, David Astle (DA)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:28:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AS</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2009/11/27/whats-da-on-about-from-the-2728th-of-november/#comment-3115</link>
		<dc:creator>AS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=467#comment-3115</guid>
		<description>You know, if I actually solved 8A, I probably wouldn&#039;t have said anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, if I actually solved 8A, I probably wouldn&#8217;t have said anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MF</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2009/11/27/whats-da-on-about-from-the-2728th-of-november/#comment-3112</link>
		<dc:creator>MF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=467#comment-3112</guid>
		<description>Sorry, AS, but I agree 100% with AL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, AS, but I agree 100% with AL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AS</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2009/11/27/whats-da-on-about-from-the-2728th-of-november/#comment-3104</link>
		<dc:creator>AS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=467#comment-3104</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say that to interpret &quot;for&quot; as &quot;in order to get the word&quot;, you&#039;re doing something that isn&#039;t really a definition and more akin to wordplay. 

A definition should not include wordplay or interpreting words as a collection of letters. That&#039;s my beef.

The you = thou thing is no big deal and not something I would have mentioned if not for the &quot;for a brothel&quot; thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say that to interpret &#8220;for&#8221; as &#8220;in order to get the word&#8221;, you&#8217;re doing something that isn&#8217;t really a definition and more akin to wordplay. </p>
<p>A definition should not include wordplay or interpreting words as a collection of letters. That&#8217;s my beef.</p>
<p>The you = thou thing is no big deal and not something I would have mentioned if not for the &#8220;for a brothel&#8221; thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AL</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2009/11/27/whats-da-on-about-from-the-2728th-of-november/#comment-3102</link>
		<dc:creator>AL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=467#comment-3102</guid>
		<description>re 8A: I really enjoyed this clue and don&#039;t understand the gripes. &quot;for&quot; can be interpreted as &quot;in order to get the word&quot; which is quite precise....and that sets up the &quot;you&quot; = THOU dressed in &quot;suit&quot; = CASE....CATHOUSE. A nice little recipe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re 8A: I really enjoyed this clue and don&#8217;t understand the gripes. &#8220;for&#8221; can be interpreted as &#8220;in order to get the word&#8221; which is quite precise&#8230;.and that sets up the &#8220;you&#8221; = THOU dressed in &#8220;suit&#8221; = CASE&#8230;.CATHOUSE. A nice little recipe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AS</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2009/11/27/whats-da-on-about-from-the-2728th-of-november/#comment-3101</link>
		<dc:creator>AS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 04:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=467#comment-3101</guid>
		<description>I reckon if the first or last word is not included in the definition, you&#039;re breaking one of the sacrosanct cryptic crossword rules.

And DA seems to have done that on a clue that&#039;s not particularly well-constructed or clever.

The thou = you I&#039;m a bit dodgy about, but the &quot;for a brothel&quot; business crosses my dodginess line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reckon if the first or last word is not included in the definition, you&#8217;re breaking one of the sacrosanct cryptic crossword rules.</p>
<p>And DA seems to have done that on a clue that&#8217;s not particularly well-constructed or clever.</p>
<p>The thou = you I&#8217;m a bit dodgy about, but the &#8220;for a brothel&#8221; business crosses my dodginess line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2009/11/27/whats-da-on-about-from-the-2728th-of-november/#comment-3100</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=467#comment-3100</guid>
		<description>22a: RB is spot on, it is a gum in the lee, therefore sheltered from the wind. No extraneous words, no double duty, just neat.
8a: &quot;For a&quot; is just permissible fill in words to allow for surface reading. No problem there. Thou = you is common in Shakespeare and the Mighty Thor. Perhaps he might have said &quot;you old&quot; but I don&#039;t think it necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>22a: RB is spot on, it is a gum in the lee, therefore sheltered from the wind. No extraneous words, no double duty, just neat.<br />
8a: &#8220;For a&#8221; is just permissible fill in words to allow for surface reading. No problem there. Thou = you is common in Shakespeare and the Mighty Thor. Perhaps he might have said &#8220;you old&#8221; but I don&#8217;t think it necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave R</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2009/11/27/whats-da-on-about-from-the-2728th-of-november/#comment-3099</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=467#comment-3099</guid>
		<description>Thanks, RB, for the explanation of 21A.  I figured it had to be &#039;rots&#039;, but DA was too tricky for me with this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, RB, for the explanation of 21A.  I figured it had to be &#8216;rots&#8217;, but DA was too tricky for me with this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Carney</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2009/11/27/whats-da-on-about-from-the-2728th-of-november/#comment-3098</link>
		<dc:creator>John Carney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=467#comment-3098</guid>
		<description>RB, re 13A: Thanks. I would never have got that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RB, re 13A: Thanks. I would never have got that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2009/11/27/whats-da-on-about-from-the-2728th-of-november/#comment-3097</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=467#comment-3097</guid>
		<description>AS, re 8A: you=thou seems OK to me. It&#039;s archaic (is that your beef?), but at least it&#039;s accurate (2nd person singular subjective pronoun, so we&#039;d use &quot;you&quot; nowadays). I agree with your objection about &quot;for&quot; or &quot;for a&quot; at the beginning of the clue - its only purpose seems to be to aid the surface reading.

MF, re 22A: the function of &quot;sheltered&quot; has me confused too. Is it doing double duty? My brain&#039;s hurting, but I&#039;ve come up with this plausible (I hope) explanation:
In the lee means on the sheltered side.
So, &quot;sheltered from wind&quot; =&gt; in the lee
So &quot;tree sheltered from wind&quot; =&gt; GUM in the LEE =&gt; LE GUM E</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AS, re 8A: you=thou seems OK to me. It&#8217;s archaic (is that your beef?), but at least it&#8217;s accurate (2nd person singular subjective pronoun, so we&#8217;d use &#8220;you&#8221; nowadays). I agree with your objection about &#8220;for&#8221; or &#8220;for a&#8221; at the beginning of the clue &#8211; its only purpose seems to be to aid the surface reading.</p>
<p>MF, re 22A: the function of &#8220;sheltered&#8221; has me confused too. Is it doing double duty? My brain&#8217;s hurting, but I&#8217;ve come up with this plausible (I hope) explanation:<br />
In the lee means on the sheltered side.<br />
So, &#8220;sheltered from wind&#8221; =&gt; in the lee<br />
So &#8220;tree sheltered from wind&#8221; =&gt; GUM in the LEE =&gt; LE GUM E</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MF</title>
		<link>http://datrippers.com/2009/11/27/whats-da-on-about-from-the-2728th-of-november/#comment-3096</link>
		<dc:creator>MF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datrippers.com/?p=467#comment-3096</guid>
		<description>22A: is &quot;sheltered&quot; doing double duty here? as both a containment indicator AND part of the definition of &quot;lee&quot;? i&#039;m confused...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>22A: is &#8220;sheltered&#8221; doing double duty here? as both a containment indicator AND part of the definition of &#8220;lee&#8221;? i&#8217;m confused&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

